By Geoffrey N. Leech
Seeks to illustrate that the learn of English poetry is enriched through the insights of contemporary linguistic research, and that linguistic and demanding disciplines aren't separate yet complementary. analyzing a variety of poetry, Professor Leech considers many facets of poetic kind, together with the language of earlier and current, inventive language, poetic licence, repetition, sound, metre, context and ambiguity.
Read or Download A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry PDF
Best english literature books
Cervantes in Seventeenth-century England garners good over one thousand English references to Cervantes and his works, hence offering the fullest and such a lot exciting early English photograph ever made up of the writings of Spain's maximum author. along with references to the 19 books of Cervantes's prose on hand to seventeenth-century English readers (including 4 little-known abridgments), this new quantity comprises entries through such remarkable writers as Ben Jonson, John Fletcher, William Wycherley, Aphra Behn, Thomas Hobbes, John Dryden, and John Locke, in addition to many lesser-known and nameless writers.
Seeks to illustrate that the examine of English poetry is enriched by way of the insights of recent linguistic research, and that linguistic and significant disciplines will not be separate yet complementary. studying a variety of poetry, Professor Leech considers many elements of poetic variety, together with the language of previous and current, artistic language, poetic licence, repetition, sound, metre, context and ambiguity.
This quantity brings jointly the foremost political writings of Mary Wollstonecraft within the order within which they seemed within the innovative 1790s. It lines her passionate and offended reaction to the thrill of the early days of the French Revolution after which her uneasiness at its later bloody section.
This publication distinguishes Milton's educational value from his actual prestige, and addresses readers with large literary pursuits, who could be able to reconsider a couple of poet whom Dryden observed as enhanced to either Homer and Virgil. The paintings is as a result a contribution to the continuing histories of Milton's popularity particularly, and literary flavor ordinarily.
- Stephen Spender: A Literary Life
- Impossible Joyce: Finnegans Wakes
- Irish Writing: Exile and Subversion
- The Facts on File Companion to British Poetry, 17th and 18th-Centuries
- The Grounds of English Literature
- Sonnet Sequences and Social Distinction in Renaissance England
Extra resources for A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry
11' d cesto commUlllca . aserrors, as trrvia 1111 :an . £i . t bit of in ormatIon. e , may convey q~ll ea. (authoritis for arthritis), at least tells us someth mg example of rna apropism fi r etrator In the second exabout the education, ch,ar;~ter, et~~b~y I~~:;e;ts that its author is a forample, the ungrammatIca iry prod fE lish The third example, occure~gn~r with, a~e~~~::f~~~~~1~:::~h~ th~~rin~er has made a mistake, that a carele:s deliberately imitated for artIstIC or conuc e ecr, < :~~ga:~l:~r: ~~~ proo~-~eader, et~.
This expectation is fulfilled in the following passage from The Merchant of Veil ice 69 in being divisible into an immediate interpretation and a wider in~erpreta tion, which takes into account its relation to other foregroundmg, and ultimately to the whole work in which it appears. betwee~l kissed and killed. This is similar to the 'mice and men' example 111 that It combines contrast with similarity. Kissing and killing have opposed connotations, the former being associated with love, and the latter with hatred and aggression.
Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all freemen? As Caesar loved me, I weep for him; as he was fortunate, I rejoice at it; as he was valiant, I honour him; but as he was ambitious, I slew him. There is tears for his love;joy for his fortune; honour for Ius valour; and death for Ius ambition. Who is here so base that would be a bondman? If any, speak; for him have I offended. Who is here so rude that would not be a Roman? If any, speak; for him have I offended.